04-05-2020, 04:50 PM -
(04-05-2020, 04:33 PM)Morph Wrote: I don’t think the situations are really comparable but I’d argue that grooming a 16 year old is a far worse offence than what she’s done
Do you think Hancock would be sacked on the spot if it turned out he had been visiting his second home?
It's not question of whether he would or he wouldn't though. It's that he should be.
Folk are calling it stupidity from the CMO but it's not, it's just total arrogance. At least the other silly bastards flaunting the guidelines can plead either ignorance or stupidity.
She should be sacked or resign immediately.