Can they use the Double Jeopardy (Scotland) Act 2011 to go back after the driver, as part of that allows the PF to charge someone if new evidence comes to light, or the original was tainted (from their website).
Not sure what happened originally as to why the driver can't be charged now...
I'd imagine any public bloodlust directed towards the guy would be from the exact same foaming fucking cretins who'll tell you that prison is a holiday camp with Playstations and Sky TV.
07-31-2015, 01:19 PM (Edited 07-31-2015, 01:24 PM by Hung S.J..)
(07-31-2015, 11:16 AM)TheMaganator2.0 Wrote: It would satisfy the non-existent public outrage and lust for blood (usually reserved for lion killers) and make us all feel better about ourselves.
The post quoted below is my favourite post on kicback right now....bearing in mind it's on the first page of a thread about an American man killing a Zimbabwean lion:
THE MAGNATOR
You cant just make stuff up to paint me as a bogey man.
And I am perfectly entitled to bitch and moan about behaviour I don't approve of. You can act within the law but still act like an animal.
The savages that chased Farage off the streets of Edinburgh didn't break the law but acted like hooligans - I disapprove of that, for example.
(mod delete. Â Please leave Scottish politics out of this discussion.)
If this guy has broken the law he should be prosecuted - he should not be hounded and his place of work should not be harassed.
I like it how the pitchforkers pick and choose what crimes they get upset about and act accordingly.
Do you think that everyone who commits a crime should be harassed? Should everyone who works with someone who has committed a crime be subjected to 'social justice' which could damage the business? The answer should, of course, be no.
Not desperate to see a lynching or crying out for a blood, but I am - like most, I imagine - left wondering what the motivation was for the crown office decision, when they were obviously not in full possession of the facts. There was something "glasgow coming together at a terrible time of tragedy' and playing to the daily record masses about it at the time which seems utterly foolish now.