This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Match of the day/sportscene inplay
Started by Ross Kemp On Spice




309 posts in this topic
Charlie Kelly
Haring Around

Posts: 15,952
Threads: 9
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 331
Status: Online

11-08-2015, 11:35 PM -
#61
(11-08-2015, 11:29 PM)2NaFish Wrote: He's still a championship striker.

Saying that Keatings is a better player than Reilly is like saying Lewis is a better poster than Mothy. They're both shite and unwelcome.

Shitwine

jjay
audioslave
Senior Member

Posts: 286
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 9
Status: Offline

11-08-2015, 11:46 PM -
#62
48 seconds of post match analysis for the Hearts game.

Forty eight fucking seconds.
CoroNaFish
Modphibian

Posts: 12,394
Threads: 82
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 708
Status: Away

11-08-2015, 11:49 PM -
#63
(11-08-2015, 11:46 PM)audioslave Wrote: 48 seconds of post match analysis for the Hearts game.

Forty eight fucking seconds.

It wasn't even a good 48 seconds. If hearts win the question is, "can hearts finish second?", if we lose then the question is "were we wrong to ask can hearts finish second?" and the answer to either is always 'they'll be there or there about'.
Mikey
Sixth Man of the Year

Posts: 4,437
Threads: 12
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 482
Status: Offline

11-08-2015, 11:49 PM -
#64
How many seconds should there have been? The game was fucking boring.
Shteve
.

Posts: 27,677
Threads: 13
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 866
Status: Offline

11-08-2015, 11:51 PM -
#65
(11-08-2015, 11:49 PM)2NaFish Wrote: it wasn't even a good 48 secondsif hearts win the question is, "can hearts finish second?", if we lose then the question is "were we wrong to ask can hearts finish second?" and the answer to either is always 'they'll be there or there about'.

That's what yer bird said Shitwine
audioslave
Senior Member

Posts: 286
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 9
Status: Offline

11-08-2015, 11:52 PM -
#66
I'd quite like post match analysis, to you know, have some form of analysis.

"See Hearts changing from 4-3-3 to 4-4-2 early on in the first half?" Nothing
"Djoum looks to be a good signing for Hearts" Nothing
"How do Accies get some consistency?" Nothing

You know, the basic shite you'd expect to get from any other highlights package. The Football League Show looks like the Super Bowl by comparison.
This post was last modified: 11-08-2015, 11:54 PM by audioslave.
shaun.lawson
Punta del Este, Uruguay

Posts: 6,730
Threads: 5
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
Status: Offline

11-08-2015, 11:54 PM -
#67
(11-08-2015, 11:49 PM)Mikey Wrote: How many seconds should there have been? The game was fucking boring.

In a way, the BBC's steadfast refusal to even attempt to polish a turd is quite admirable. Cool
shaun.lawson
Punta del Este, Uruguay

Posts: 6,730
Threads: 5
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
Status: Offline

11-08-2015, 11:56 PM -
#68
(11-08-2015, 11:52 PM)audioslave Wrote: I'd quite like post match analysis, to you know, have some form of analysis.

"See Hearts changing from 4-3-3 to 4-4-2 early on in the first half?" Nothing

During the 2013 diddy cup final - Special Needs Locke out-thought by Danny Lennon FFS - the commentators actually did this. Actually analysed what was happening tactically. I'd never seen that in Scottish football before, ever.
CoroNaFish
Modphibian

Posts: 12,394
Threads: 82
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 708
Status: Away

11-08-2015, 11:57 PM -
#69
(11-08-2015, 11:51 PM)Amnesiac Wrote: That's what yer bird said Shitwine

I was wrong, Lewis. I can admit that now.

After seeing this post I now see that you are, in fact, much worse than mothy.

"That's what yer bird said"?

Cornette
audioslave
Senior Member

Posts: 286
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 9
Status: Offline

11-08-2015, 11:57 PM -
#70
Spent more time gushing over a neck-less James Forrest kicking the ball round a boy then running after it.
shaun.lawson
Punta del Este, Uruguay

Posts: 6,730
Threads: 5
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
Status: Offline

11-08-2015, 11:58 PM -
#71
(11-08-2015, 11:51 PM)Amnesiac Wrote: That's what yer bird said Shitwine

Lewis, I feel kinda bad joining in, but seriously, man...

Cornette
Mikey
Sixth Man of the Year

Posts: 4,437
Threads: 12
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 482
Status: Offline

11-08-2015, 11:59 PM -
#72
If they asked questions about tactics etc it would be the boring, stock answers these types of clowns trot out repeated week, after week anyway.

I'd rather they just showed a good 7 to 8 minutes of highlights and done away with some ex footballing jobbers blethering Jonathan Wilson-esque shite about midfield trivotes.
This post was last modified: 11-09-2015, 12:00 AM by Mikey.
shaun.lawson
Punta del Este, Uruguay

Posts: 6,730
Threads: 5
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
Status: Offline

11-09-2015, 12:00 AM -
#73
(11-08-2015, 11:59 PM)Mikey Wrote: If they asked questions about tactics etc it would be the boring, stock answers these types of clowns trot out repeated week after week anyway.

I'd rather they just showed a good 7 to 8 minutes of highlights and done away with some ex footballing jobbers try and start blethering Jonathan Wilson-esque shite about midfield trivotes.

Laugh

Pozzied. However double-edged that post is.
audioslave
Senior Member

Posts: 286
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 9
Status: Offline

11-09-2015, 12:02 AM -
#74
Every game isn't going to have 8 minutes worth of highlights but there shouldn't be anything stopping folk chatting about the game for a few minutes afterwards without the patter being;

"Can Aberdeen/Hearts/Ross County/St Johnstone finish 2nd"

Then moving on like literally fuck all else happened in the game worthy of discussion.

With that Hearts game you could easily have highlighted some of the Hamilton boys flying into challenges, or in the Ross County game, at least acknowledging their presence in the post match discussion. No wonder the BBC don't want to chuck any more dollar at us if this is the slop we're serving up with what they're already giving us.
Shteve
.

Posts: 27,677
Threads: 13
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 866
Status: Offline

11-09-2015, 12:06 AM -
#75
"Can Aberdeen/Hearts/Ross County/St Johnstone finish 2nd"

That seems to be their go to patter every week, or can so and so get a shout for Scotland after a couple of half decent performances in the SPL, always met with the same answers. "Well, if he keeps working hard" or "they'll be up there"
Charlie Kelly
Haring Around

Posts: 15,952
Threads: 9
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 331
Status: Online

11-09-2015, 12:09 AM -
#76
(11-08-2015, 11:49 PM)2NaFish Wrote: It wasn't even a good 48 seconds. If hearts win the question is, "can hearts finish second?", if we lose then the question is "were we wrong to ask can hearts finish second?" and the answer to either is always 'they'll be there or there about'.

(11-09-2015, 12:06 AM)Amnesiac Wrote: "Can Aberdeen/Hearts/Ross County/St Johnstone finish 2nd"

That seems to be their go to patter every week, or can so and so get a shout for Scotland after a couple of half decent performances in the SPL, always met with the same answers. "Well, if he keeps working hard" or "they'll be up there"

Freshly served indeed Jose
Little Bit Of The Boycey
Jumbo Soldier

Posts: 16,992
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,239
Status: Online

11-09-2015, 12:10 AM -
#77
It's actually sickening watching MOTD2 and seeing it done properly. Just a great bit about Spurs' tactics and pressing there, which took longer than the entire package for most of the Scottish games we just got.
audioslave
Senior Member

Posts: 286
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 9
Status: Offline

11-09-2015, 12:15 AM -
#78
I expect Sportscene to resemble one of those REKT videos by the end of the season.
Frank Uchewood
Posting Freak

Posts: 4,603
Threads: 8
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation: 175
Status: Online

11-09-2015, 12:17 AM -
#79
Does anyone honestly think the people who go on the panel on Sportscene have the ability to break down games like that? Especially when given a long highlights package to try and dissect? I'm not convinced these pundits see the full games in real time a la MOTD.

Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
This post was last modified: 11-09-2015, 12:19 AM by Frank Uchewood.
Little Bit Of The Boycey
Jumbo Soldier

Posts: 16,992
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,239
Status: Online

11-09-2015, 12:20 AM -
#80
(11-09-2015, 12:17 AM)Frank Underwood Wrote: Doea anyone honestly think the people who go are on the panel on Sportscene have the ability to break down games like that? Especially given a long highlights  package to try and dissect? I'm not convinced these pundits see the full games in real time a la MOTD.

Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk


That's a big part of the problem. Guaranteed Jenas and Keown have been in the studio looking over tapes and analysing the games for hours before the programme goes out. It is a NAP that McCall and Thompson stroll in half an hour before recording and get a quick make up, quick mike up and that's them. They'll be talking about games they've seen nothing of before. Jonathan Sutherland asking the most inane questions in the world doesn't help either.

It's just an all-around lack of effort.



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)