This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Climate Change
Started by Top-Boy




245 posts in this topic
Roger H. Sterling
Category 3 Poster

Posts: 17,647
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1,003
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 03:20 PM -
#61
(08-30-2017, 03:14 PM)Missed98 Wrote: I do live in the desert, which actually makes my carbon footprint enormous.....

As for CC, well you're all over the place with your non-cohesive arguments as pointed out above.

If you really want to have an opinion on this, probably best if you understand it first.

Final point, Climate change is caused by those pesky benefit spongers....oh ma sides.

What are you on about? Did I say that moving to the desert would reduce our carbon output? No, I didn't, you bell. So much for your cohesive argument, maybe you should read more carefully.

Can't believe you took my suggestion we move to the desert seriously, whilst completely ignoring my other suggestion, in the same sentence, of just finding a new Earth.

What's with people today Monty Chuckle
Johnny
Known slaver

Posts: 11,560
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2015
Reputation: 686
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 03:22 PM -
#62
Hope you thought you were replying to CC there Monty Chuckle
Shteve
.

Posts: 24,000
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 668
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 03:23 PM -
#63
Monty Chuckle heads gone.
Roger H. Sterling
Category 3 Poster

Posts: 17,647
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1,003
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 03:24 PM -
#64
(08-30-2017, 03:22 PM)Johnny Wrote: Hope you thought you were replying to CC there Monty Chuckle

Nope. Just another guy who types before he thinks.
Johnny
Known slaver

Posts: 11,560
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2015
Reputation: 686
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 03:37 PM -
#65
Could've done without the ad hominem tbh May Bee

Hung
Roger H. Sterling
Category 3 Poster

Posts: 17,647
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1,003
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 03:47 PM -
#66
(08-30-2017, 03:37 PM)Johnny Wrote: Could've done without the ad hominem tbh  May Bee

Hung

He probably should've patched the strawman then Jezza
Top-Boy
Stupidhouse

Posts: 30,618
Threads: 277
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,664
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 03:49 PM -
#67
Rog has completely misread the tone of that reply Warnock
Top-Boy
Stupidhouse

Posts: 30,618
Threads: 277
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,664
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 03:50 PM -
#68
(08-30-2017, 03:47 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: He probably should've patched the strawman then  Jezza

What straw man?
TheSitzpinkler
Elite

Posts: 12,601
Threads: 72
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 907
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 04:01 PM -
#69
(08-30-2017, 03:24 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: Nope. Just another guy who types before he thinks.

Erm. He's saying CC is talking shite.

Eek
[Image: giphy.gif]
Roger H. Sterling
Category 3 Poster

Posts: 17,647
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1,003
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 04:08 PM -
#70
(08-30-2017, 03:49 PM)Conor-McStupid Wrote: Rog has completely misread the tone of that reply Warnock

Reckon I have aye Warnock

Thought everything after "as for cc" was meant for me Eek

Sorry m98 Laugh
Missed98
Member

Posts: 155
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 3
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 04:09 PM -
#71
(08-30-2017, 03:20 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: What are you on about? Did I say that moving to the desert would reduce our carbon output? No, I didn't, you bell. So much for your cohesive argument, maybe you should read more carefully.

Can't believe you took my suggestion we move to the desert seriously, whilst completely ignoring my other suggestion, in the same sentence, of just finding a new Earth.

What's with people today  Monty Chuckle

Ehh sorry mate, this was aimed at CC not you.  The desert comment was supposed to be flippant.

lol, i typed the post above before reading the rest of the page....no worries.
This post was last modified: 08-30-2017, 04:11 PM by Missed98.
Haven't thought of a funny signature yet....

2NoDealFish
Modphibian

Posts: 11,170
Threads: 80
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 633
Status: Away

08-30-2017, 04:11 PM -
#72
Missed98 may live in the desert but it seems it's Rog that has got sand in his vagina.
Missed98
Member

Posts: 155
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 3
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 04:14 PM -
#73
(08-30-2017, 04:11 PM)2Nafferty Wrote: Missed98 may live in the desert but it seems it's Rog that has got sand in his vagina.

Lol, wait are you suggesting i've got a vagina ????
Haven't thought of a funny signature yet....

2NoDealFish
Modphibian

Posts: 11,170
Threads: 80
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 633
Status: Away

08-30-2017, 04:18 PM -
#74
(08-30-2017, 04:14 PM)Missed98 Wrote: Lol, wait are you suggesting i've got a vagina ????

You're looking for the gender studies thread, madam.
Missed98
Member

Posts: 155
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 3
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 04:25 PM -
#75
(08-30-2017, 04:18 PM)2Nafferty Wrote: You're looking for the gender studies thread, madam.

Can't be arsed going through them, is there a name for someone who has had their gender identified by an anonymous poster on the web. Must be on that list somewhere
pondlife
Posting Freak

Posts: 7,636
Threads: 4
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 602
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 04:59 PM -
#76
(08-30-2017, 11:25 AM)i8hibsh Wrote: Not read the entire thread so not sure if already mentioned but the biggest climate change the planet has ever seen (the ice age) and then of course the global warming of the planet to melt the ice was before man was even a glimmer in Mother Nature's eye.   Proof of course that climate change happens irrespective of mankind. However, we are clearly expediting the process of the next change though.  That been said it would still happen – just not as quick.

This is correct; we're currently in the midst of an inter-glacial.  It's up to us to mitigate the best we can, and to just turn off the nasty stuff is probably naive, well certainly from an immediate economic standpoint.  It may work out in the long run but hey whoever thinks long term these days, other than the sandal brigade.

I'm all for the environment and have been since before it became all hipster and shit so back the fuck off with your replies.   Monty Oh You
This post was last modified: 08-30-2017, 05:01 PM by pondlife.
Top-Boy
Stupidhouse

Posts: 30,618
Threads: 277
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,664
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 05:20 PM -
#77
(08-30-2017, 04:25 PM)Missed98 Wrote: Can't be arsed going through them, is there a name for someone who has had their gender identified by an anonymous poster on the web.  Must be on that list somewhere

If not there should be. And it would be beautiful that i8 would be to thank for its conception Savoury
Top-Boy
Stupidhouse

Posts: 30,618
Threads: 277
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,664
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 05:22 PM -
#78
I like how i8 thought he was dropping the hottest of takes with his natural climate change mind blower Laugh
Coppercrutch
Banned

Posts: 1,389
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 05:39 PM -
#79
(08-30-2017, 12:49 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: Why, CC? Why? If it's not really proven we're doing any harm to the environment, why would it would be COMMON SENSE to reduce our pollution and energy outputs? WHY? A good answer please, preferably your own opinion.

Your "simple" sums are utter shite. They make no sense and prove nothing of note. It's not even a sum. Can't even get that right. You're yet again making no points at all whilst trying to tell others they're wrong. Dab hand at that by now. What do we benefit from reduction of pollution and energy if not a reduction in harm to the environment?

The amount of people isn't the problem with pollution, it's the processes that create the pollution that need changed. It's a very simple concept to get you head around, I can't see why a man who's been educated at a top top University would struggle with that.

Beggars belief.

Because pollution is shit, messy, smells and can cause all manner of problems including huge health problems. 

This really is like being in nursery.

Warnock
Coppercrutch
Banned

Posts: 1,389
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation:
Status: Offline

08-30-2017, 05:46 PM -
#80
(08-30-2017, 12:45 PM)Conor-McStupid Wrote: Easy read: 

CC doesn't believe that climate change is man made. He also agrees that it is more than likely, probably. 

Even though it's not man made, population increase will result in climate change.

His overall point - There is also natural climate change so man made climate change doesn't matter. We should however not pollute as much. Not because it harms the environment, just because 'common sense'

NB. He thinks i8 has a modicum of sense so the above should probably just be ignored.

You have completely misread and misrepresented what I've said and I'm not even going to waste my time pointing out why.

I shall leave you lot to discuss this subject. This thread is beneath me. And I don't say that in any condescending manner - it really is. I'm not going to go into details as to why. 

You can trust me on that one.


Enjoy.

I hope you may learn something. But I'm doubtful on that one.



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)