This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Triggered: Brexit Thread
Started by Top-Boy




4065 posts in this topic
Charlie Kelly
Haring Around

Posts: 13,298
Threads: 9
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 264
Status: Online

04-02-2017, 06:58 PM -
#41
Hope they're not expecting weeds like us to fight the Spaniards Eek
Top-Boy
Stupidhouse

Posts: 30,626
Threads: 277
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,664
Status: Online

04-02-2017, 07:05 PM -
#42
Me and Francis will take care of your wives and girlfriends Smug

Hopefully our squad all sign up and are massacred on the beaches of Benidorm jjay
Bill Cosby
Posting Freak

Posts: 4,182
Threads: 37
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 94
Status: Offline

04-02-2017, 08:57 PM -
#43
Fancy our chances.

Monty Smug
Drederick Tatum
Desperate Tatum

Posts: 16,534
Threads: 44
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 388
Status: Online

04-05-2017, 09:02 AM -
#44
Can anyone tell me in quite simple terms why the UK should pay money for future EU projects? I understand a commitment to pensions and other costs associated with our membership but why future projects?

The EU seem quite worried to be losing our cash input.
Morph
Elite

Posts: 27,875
Threads: 107
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,311
Status: Online

04-05-2017, 09:39 AM -
#45
(04-05-2017, 09:02 AM)Isma Tatum Wrote: Can anyone tell me in quite simple terms why the UK should pay money for future EU projects? I understand a commitment to pensions and other costs associated with our membership but why future projects?

The EU seem quite worried to be losing our cash input.

We will have said we are going to invest a certain amount, which the budget for these future projects would be decided on and will already be somewhat underway.

Well basically be under some form of contract that says we'll give so much, can't just pan that when you leave you need to fulfil commitments already made.
[Image: n7oPFZa.gif]

Sterling Archer
The Foracle

Posts: 12,001
Threads: 103
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 380
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 11:39 AM -
#46
[Image: DItusKpXgAAgqp8.jpg]
Grumblebum
Posting Freak

Posts: 21,809
Threads: 834
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 818
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 11:42 AM -
#47
(09-04-2017, 11:39 AM)Sterling Archer Wrote: [Image: DItusKpXgAAgqp8.jpg]

I see no flaws in this plan.
Cadalack Ron
Elite

Posts: 446
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 51
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 11:58 AM -
#48
gist
(09-04-2017, 11:39 AM)Sterling Archer Wrote: [Image: DItusKpXgAAgqp8.jpg]

A civil servant who's name is Penpusha, are we supposed to believe that this is not made up?

Warnock
This post was last modified: 09-04-2017, 11:58 AM by Cadalack Ron.
2NoDealFish
Modphibian

Posts: 11,171
Threads: 80
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 634
Status: Away

09-04-2017, 11:59 AM -
#49
It's clearly from the eye
Acey
baller

Posts: 25,637
Threads: 156
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,755
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 11:59 AM -
#50
Nothing gets past you, Dok. Monty Oh You
(08-02-2018, 09:04 AM)Mags Wrote: The answer is Yes.
[Image: 7IL90Oi.png]

Cadalack Ron
Elite

Posts: 446
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 51
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 12:03 PM -
#51
(09-04-2017, 11:59 AM)2Nafferty Wrote: It's clearly from the eye

Fuck sake. Muggy
Top-Boy
Stupidhouse

Posts: 30,626
Threads: 277
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,664
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 12:14 PM -
#52
Monty Chuckle
Walter Sobchak
over the line

Posts: 18,006
Threads: 160
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 990
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 12:28 PM -
#53
(09-04-2017, 11:58 AM)Frank Reynolds Wrote: gist
A civil servant who's name is Penpusha, are we supposed to believe that this is not made up?

Warnock

Eek
Sterling Archer
The Foracle

Posts: 12,001
Threads: 103
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 380
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 12:35 PM -
#54
Monty Chuckle
Grumblebum
Posting Freak

Posts: 21,809
Threads: 834
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 818
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 12:45 PM -
#55
(09-04-2017, 11:59 AM)2Nafferty Wrote: It's clearly from the eye

Makes the whole world blind. Monty Oh Well
Guy Incognito
Eleet

Posts: 4,615
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 143
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 02:08 PM -
#56
(09-04-2017, 11:59 AM)Acey Wrote: Nothing gets past you, Dok. Monty Oh You

Slander
Acey
baller

Posts: 25,637
Threads: 156
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,755
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 02:12 PM -
#57
Fuck, sorry. Warnock I lose track of all the little posters.
(08-02-2018, 09:04 AM)Mags Wrote: The answer is Yes.
[Image: 7IL90Oi.png]

Top-Boy
Stupidhouse

Posts: 30,626
Threads: 277
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,664
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 02:20 PM -
#58
Thought That was Dok and Steve McQueen was Johnny Eek
Groot
Moderator

Posts: 5,743
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 421
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 02:24 PM -
#59
How could Steve McQueen be Johnny when Johnny is already Johnny ya flump
[Image: giphy.gif?resize=620%2C258&quality=80&strip=all&ssl=1]
Roger H. Sterling
Category 3 Poster

Posts: 17,652
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1,003
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 02:24 PM -
#60
(09-04-2017, 02:20 PM)Conor-McStupid Wrote: Thought That was Dok and Steve McQueen was Johnny Eek

Hate when vanilla posters change their name. They literally just disappear. Couldn't tell you who Dok is right now, or who Steve McQueen ever was.



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)