This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Triggered: Brexit Thread
Started by Top-Boyce




4417 posts in this topic
Charlie Kelly
Haring Around

Posts: 14,493
Threads: 8
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 291
Status: Online

04-02-2017, 06:58 PM -
#41
Hope they're not expecting weeds like us to fight the Spaniards Eek
Top-Boyce
Stupidhouse

Posts: 31,371
Threads: 278
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,709
Status: Online

04-02-2017, 07:05 PM -
#42
Me and Francis will take care of your wives and girlfriends Smug

Hopefully our squad all sign up and are massacred on the beaches of Benidorm jjay
Bill Cosby
Posting Freak

Posts: 4,182
Threads: 37
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 94
Status: Offline

04-02-2017, 08:57 PM -
#43
Fancy our chances.

Monty Smug
Our Daniel Tatum
Desperate Tatum

Posts: 17,355
Threads: 46
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 400
Status: Offline

04-05-2017, 09:02 AM -
#44
Can anyone tell me in quite simple terms why the UK should pay money for future EU projects? I understand a commitment to pensions and other costs associated with our membership but why future projects?

The EU seem quite worried to be losing our cash input.
Morph
Elite

Posts: 29,038
Threads: 108
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,363
Status: Offline

04-05-2017, 09:39 AM -
#45
(04-05-2017, 09:02 AM)Isma Tatum Wrote: Can anyone tell me in quite simple terms why the UK should pay money for future EU projects? I understand a commitment to pensions and other costs associated with our membership but why future projects?

The EU seem quite worried to be losing our cash input.

We will have said we are going to invest a certain amount, which the budget for these future projects would be decided on and will already be somewhat underway.

Well basically be under some form of contract that says we'll give so much, can't just pan that when you leave you need to fulfil commitments already made.
[Image: n7oPFZa.gif]

Sterling Archer
The Foracle

Posts: 12,162
Threads: 104
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 399
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 11:39 AM -
#46
[Image: DItusKpXgAAgqp8.jpg]
Grumblebum
Posting Freak

Posts: 23,714
Threads: 851
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 866
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 11:42 AM -
#47
(09-04-2017, 11:39 AM)Sterling Archer Wrote: [Image: DItusKpXgAAgqp8.jpg]

I see no flaws in this plan.
Cadalack Ron
Elite

Posts: 534
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 60
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 11:58 AM -
#48
gist
(09-04-2017, 11:39 AM)Sterling Archer Wrote: [Image: DItusKpXgAAgqp8.jpg]

A civil servant who's name is Penpusha, are we supposed to believe that this is not made up?

Warnock
This post was last modified: 09-04-2017, 11:58 AM by Cadalack Ron.
Thunfisch
Modphibian

Posts: 11,722
Threads: 81
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 672
Status: Away

09-04-2017, 11:59 AM -
#49
It's clearly from the eye
Adonis Aceyjaj
baller

Posts: 27,100
Threads: 164
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,914
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 11:59 AM -
#50
Nothing gets past you, Dok. Monty Oh You
(08-02-2018, 09:04 AM)Mags Wrote: The answer is Yes.
[Image: 7IL90Oi.png]

Cadalack Ron
Elite

Posts: 534
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 60
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 12:03 PM -
#51
(09-04-2017, 11:59 AM)2Nafferty Wrote: It's clearly from the eye

Fuck sake. Muggy
Top-Boyce
Stupidhouse

Posts: 31,371
Threads: 278
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,709
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 12:14 PM -
#52
Monty Chuckle
Walter Boycechak
over the line

Posts: 18,688
Threads: 160
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,017
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 12:28 PM -
#53
(09-04-2017, 11:58 AM)Frank Reynolds Wrote: gist
A civil servant who's name is Penpusha, are we supposed to believe that this is not made up?

Warnock

Eek
Sterling Archer
The Foracle

Posts: 12,162
Threads: 104
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 399
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 12:35 PM -
#54
Monty Chuckle
Grumblebum
Posting Freak

Posts: 23,714
Threads: 851
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 866
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 12:45 PM -
#55
(09-04-2017, 11:59 AM)2Nafferty Wrote: It's clearly from the eye

Makes the whole world blind. Monty Oh Well
Guy Incognito
Eleet

Posts: 4,616
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 143
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 02:08 PM -
#56
(09-04-2017, 11:59 AM)Acey Wrote: Nothing gets past you, Dok. Monty Oh You

Slander
Adonis Aceyjaj
baller

Posts: 27,100
Threads: 164
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,914
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 02:12 PM -
#57
Fuck, sorry. Warnock I lose track of all the little posters.
(08-02-2018, 09:04 AM)Mags Wrote: The answer is Yes.
[Image: 7IL90Oi.png]

Top-Boyce
Stupidhouse

Posts: 31,371
Threads: 278
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 1,709
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 02:20 PM -
#58
Thought That was Dok and Steve McQueen was Johnny Eek
Groot
Super Moderator

Posts: 6,038
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 457
Status: Offline

09-04-2017, 02:24 PM -
#59
How could Steve McQueen be Johnny when Johnny is already Johnny ya flump
[Image: giphy.gif?resize=620%2C258&quality=80&strip=all&ssl=1]
Roger H. Sterling
Category 3 Poster

Posts: 18,117
Threads: 48
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1,042
Status: Online

09-04-2017, 02:24 PM -
#60
(09-04-2017, 02:20 PM)Conor-McStupid Wrote: Thought That was Dok and Steve McQueen was Johnny Eek

Hate when vanilla posters change their name. They literally just disappear. Couldn't tell you who Dok is right now, or who Steve McQueen ever was.



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)