09-15-2017, 01:10 PM
Wasnt that part of the Pentagon being refurbished when it was hit
09-15-2017, 01:17 PM
Any links to the pentagon being hit? or was the cctv not working that day
09-15-2017, 01:20 PM
09-15-2017, 01:24 PM
Yes you did.
Quote: A bunch of wee Saudi Arabians that can't fly a Cessna don't take control of the sky above New York, and proceed to plough passenger planes in to buildings at speeds that are literally impossible at the altitudes they are flying at.
09-15-2017, 01:27 PM
(09-15-2017, 01:17 PM)Craig Levein-Style Icon Wrote: Any links to the pentagon being hit? or was the cctv not working that day These are the sort of "I'm very smart" questions that I'm talking about. There's one grainy bit of cctv footage showing it hit. I've read there's up to 78 other pieces of footage from the surrounding areas that were confiscated and never released. Who knows what they show, but the fact they haven't been released is prime fodder for theorists. This being the plane.
09-15-2017, 01:28 PM
09-15-2017, 01:29 PM
Looks like a plane shaped hole to me.
09-15-2017, 01:29 PM
09-15-2017, 01:30 PM
09-15-2017, 01:30 PM
(09-15-2017, 01:27 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: These are the sort of "I'm very smart" questions that I'm talking about. Nothing there looks remotely like a plane.
09-15-2017, 01:34 PM
I wonder if you're aware of what "Frame Rate" is ?
09-15-2017, 01:36 PM
(09-15-2017, 01:29 PM)Leveinda Wrote: Think he's saying it wasn't the folk that were claimed to have flown them into the building that did it. No, he's saying it is literally impossible to fly at that speed at that altitude. He discusses explosions in the same post. He is saying it defied the laws of physics so must be an explosion.
09-15-2017, 01:36 PM
(09-15-2017, 01:30 PM)Alan Partridge Wrote: What did you mean by literally impossible? Quote:Recently Pilots For 9/11 Truth have analyzed the speeds reported for the aircraft utilized on 9/11. Numerous aviation experts have voiced their concerns regarding the extremely excessive speeds reported above Maximum Operating for the 757 and 767, particularly, United and American Airlines 757/767 Captains who have actual flight time in all 4 aircraft reportedly used on 9/11. These experts state the speeds are impossible to achieve near sea level in thick air if the aircraft were a standard 757/767 as reported. Combined with the fact the airplane which was reported to strike the south tower of the World Trade Center was also producing high G Loading while turning and pulling out from a dive, the whole issue becomes incomprehensible to fathom a standard 767 can perform such maneuvers at such intense speeds exceeding Maximum Operating limits of the aircraft. Especially for those who research the topic thoroughly and have expertise in aviation.
09-15-2017, 01:37 PM
09-15-2017, 01:38 PM
Right, so you ARE saying it wasn't a plane then. Are are you suggesting it wasn't a passenger jet but another plane? If so, what? Help me out here bud. Also, where is that quote from?
09-15-2017, 01:39 PM
(09-15-2017, 01:38 PM)Alan Partridge Wrote: Right, so you ARE saying it wasn't a plane then. Are are you suggesting it wasn't a passenger jet but another plane? If so, what? Help me out here bud. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/911_Aircraf...Deets.html
09-15-2017, 01:39 PM
(09-15-2017, 01:29 PM)Leveinda Wrote: Think he's saying it wasn't the folk that were claimed to have flown them into the building that did it. So what's the alternative? The men on the planes were stooges? The men in the airports that bought tickets for the flights that there's plenty record of that have ties to Al Qaeda, all faked? The phone calls from Flight 93, and the cockpit recordings of the hijackers, all faked? (09-15-2017, 01:30 PM)Leveinda Wrote: Nothing there looks remotely like a plane. Really? Not even "remotely"? Not even a stretch? Where's the missile that hit? Did you watch the footage? There's exactly one frame where a giant white cylindrical shape appears in the frame and the next frame is an explosion where it was headed. You can't see that?
09-15-2017, 01:41 PM
(Edited 09-15-2017, 01:42 PM by Roger H. Sterling.)
09-15-2017, 01:43 PM
09-15-2017, 01:51 PM
Just look at the right of that gif. That big white object coming and going from the frame. Imagine looking at that and deciding it's not even remotely similar to a plane |
|